Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Responds to Inquiries from Politicians on Microsoft’s Acquisition of Activision Blizzard

Ubisoft Will Reveal What’s Next For The Division Franchise This Week
April 13, 2023
Operation Rumors: What to Expect from Counter-Strike 2’s New Operation in 2023 on Source 2 Engine
April 21, 2023

The recent announcement of Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard, one of the largest video game publishers in the world, has raised eyebrows among politicians and regulators. As the deal is expected to have a significant impact on the gaming industry and consumer choices, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), a U.S. government agency responsible for protecting consumer interests, has been closely monitoring the situation. In response to inquiries from politicians, the FTC boss has provided insights on the Microsoft-Activision Blizzard deal.

The FTC’s Oversight Role in Mergers and Acquisitions

As part of its mandate, the FTC reviews mergers and acquisitions to determine their impact on competition, consumer welfare, and market dynamics. The agency evaluates whether such deals would result in anti-competitive behavior, reduce consumer choices, or harm the interests of consumers. The Microsoft-Activision Blizzard deal, which is estimated to be worth $68.7 billion, has raised concerns among politicians and regulators about its potential impact on the gaming industry.

Politicians’ Questions and the FTC’s Response

During a recent hearing on Capitol Hill, politicians raised several questions regarding the Microsoft-Activision Blizzard deal, and the FTC boss, who was present at the hearing, responded to these inquiries. Here are some key highlights:

    Market Concentration: Politicians expressed concerns about the increased concentration of power in the gaming industry as a result of the acquisition. The FTC boss acknowledged that the agency is closely monitoring the deal and would conduct a thorough review to ensure that it does not result in anti-competitive behavior or harm consumer interests.

    Consumer Choice: Several politicians questioned whether the deal would reduce consumer choices in the gaming market, potentially leading to higher prices and fewer options for gamers. The FTC boss assured that the agency would carefully assess the impact of the deal on consumer choices and would take appropriate actions to safeguard consumer interests.

    Competitive Landscape: Politicians also sought insights into how the Microsoft-Activision Blizzard deal would affect the competitive landscape of the gaming industry. The FTC boss highlighted that the agency would analyze the deal’s potential impact on competition, taking into consideration factors such as market share, barriers to entry, and competitive dynamics.

    Innovation and Investment: Some politicians raised concerns about the impact of the deal on innovation and investment in the gaming industry. The FTC boss emphasized that the agency would evaluate whether the deal would stifle innovation or hinder investment in the industry, which could have long-term consequences for consumers.

    Consumer Protection: Lastly, politicians inquired about the potential impact of the deal on consumer protection, including issues such as data privacy, cybersecurity, and customer support. The FTC boss assured that the agency would assess the deal’s impact on consumer protection, particularly in areas such as data handling and customer service, to ensure that consumers’ rights are protected.


As Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard continues to garner attention and scrutiny, the FTC’s role in overseeing the deal is crucial in ensuring that it does not result in anti-competitive behavior, harm consumer interests, or stifle innovation in the gaming industry. The agency’s response to politicians’ questions underscores its commitment to safeguarding consumer rights and maintaining a competitive landscape in the gaming market. As the deal progresses, the FTC’s thorough review and assessment will play a significant role in shaping the outcome and protecting the interests of gamers and consumers alike.

Comments are closed.